{"id":1773,"date":"2025-04-22T07:00:46","date_gmt":"2025-04-22T07:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/?p=1773"},"modified":"2025-04-22T07:00:48","modified_gmt":"2025-04-22T07:00:48","slug":"supreme-court-urges-respect-for-judiciary-after-mps-remarks-target-cji","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/?p=1773","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Urges Respect for Judiciary After MP’s Remarks Target CJI"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

New Delhi:<\/strong>
The Supreme Court of India<\/strong> on Monday emphasized the need to preserve the decorum and reputation of the judiciary<\/strong>, following allegations made by a parliamentarian targeting Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bench, comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh<\/strong>, made the remarks during a hearing on a PIL filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari<\/strong> regarding hate speeches<\/strong> and violence in West Bengal\u2019s Murshidabad district<\/strong> in the wake of protests against the Waqf (Amendment) Act<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\ud83d\udde8\ufe0f “Even Allegations Must Uphold Respect” \u2014 Supreme Court<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Referring to BJP MP Nishikant Dubey\u2019s controversial comments<\/strong>, Tiwari told the court that the parliamentarian accused the Chief Justice of causing \u201ccivil wars\u201d and questioned the court\u2019s role in law-making, suggesting that \u201cParliament and assemblies should be shut.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response, the court advised restraint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe should maintain certain decorum and the reputation of the institution, even in making allegations. In an Article 32 petition, the content must remain respectful,\u201d<\/em> the bench remarked.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bench allowed Tiwari to amend his petition<\/strong> and submit more concrete evidence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\ud83e\uddd1\u200d\u2696\ufe0f BJP Distances Itself from Dubey’s Comments<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In a bid to defuse the tension, BJP President J.P. Nadda<\/strong> clarified that Dubey\u2019s remarks were his personal opinions<\/strong>, not the official stance of the party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe BJP respects the judiciary as an inseparable pillar of democracy,\u201d<\/em> Nadda said.<\/strong>
He also directed party leaders to avoid making such statements in the future<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\ud83d\udd25 Violence in Bengal Over Waqf Act Sparks Legal Scrutiny<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Tiwari\u2019s plea describes violent unrest<\/strong> in Murshidabad and North 24 Parganas<\/strong>, triggered by public opposition to the newly-enacted Waqf (Amendment) Act<\/strong>. The unrest, he claimed, resulted in loss of lives and property<\/strong>, worsened by provocative political speeches<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSome political parties use religious sentiments for electoral gain, rather than promoting peace,\u201d<\/em> the petition alleges.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\ud83e\uddfe Key Demands in the PIL<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. \ud83d\udcdc Formation of a Judicial Enquiry Commission<\/strong>
    Led by a retired Supreme Court judge to probe the violence in Murshidabad.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. \ud83d\udcdb Crackdown on Hate Speech<\/strong>
    Direction to the West Bengal government<\/strong> to take strict action against hate and inflammatory remarks by political leaders.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. \ud83d\udd01 Enforcement of SC\u2019s 2022 Ruling<\/strong>
    The plea references the October 21, 2022 Supreme Court order<\/strong> that mandated action against individuals \u2014 including public officials \u2014 who make hate speeches.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
    \n\n\n\n

    \ud83c\udd95 Fresh Clashes in South 24 Parganas<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    New violence linked to the Waqf (Amendment) Act<\/strong> erupted in the Bhangar area of South 24 Parganas<\/strong> on April 14<\/strong>, even as police claimed that Murshidabad’s situation had stabilized<\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    New Delhi:The Supreme Court of India on Monday emphasized the need to preserve the decorum and reputation of the judiciary, following allegations made by a parliamentarian…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1774,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1773","post","has-post-thumbnail","category-national"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1773"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1775,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1773\/revisions\/1775"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/duggarsamvad.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}